As the Federal Government intensifies its war on corruption, a
chartered quantity surveyor has identified construction contracts as one
of the biggest source of corruption in the country.
Speaking as a
guest at a lecture organised recently by the Department of Physical
Planning and Works of Bells University of Technology, Ota, Francis
Oluwole Adetola, managing Partner at FO.AB Partnership, pointed out that
corruption was the biggest threat to Nigeria’s economic and social
development.
While defining a contract as a legally binding
relationship and a mutual agreement between two parties, Adetola
revealed that a fraud occurs when at least one party deliberately
misrepresents the terms of the contract by deceit.
Explaining
further, he said that fraud occurs when any of the parties involved uses
the operation or execution of the contract for his personal gains
outside the terms of the contract.
Adetola, who is a procurement
economist, said that mobilisation fees have become the easiest
instrument to perpetrate fraud in Nigeria; “contractors love it because
it is the easiest form of fraud mechanism”.
He argued that the
present structure, wherein the professional independence of the quantity
surveyors as a professional group is not guaranteed, is fraud and
corruption laden.
In Nigeria, he said: “Construction contracts are
embarked upon, when the awarding authorities of such contracts know
that enough fund have either been budgeted or appropriated for the
duration of such contracts.
He identified bid rigging, bribes and
kickbacks, over-invoicing, use of substandard materials and payment
falsifications, as some other ways through which frauds are perpetrated
in the country; adding that frauds are also perpetrated though billing
and payment for work not executed.
Other areas through which
frauds are perpetrated, he noted, are collaboration of government
officials with suppliers/subcontractors on one hand and manipulation of
provisional sums and contingency, on the other hand.
The managing
partner of FA.OB Partnership stated that payment methods, quantity
verification, quality specification and execution are done in such a way
as to encourage and perpetrate frauds in Ministries, Departments and
Agencies (MDAs) at all tiers of government in Nigeria.
He stressed that the root of the problem is the way the MDAs in charge of construction procurement in Nigeria were created.
“No
single department has ever been created for quantity surveying for cost
and value management purposes in any federal or state ministry in the
country”, he said.
The procurement economist identified target
areas for fraud in construction contracts as payment methods, quantity
verification, quality specification and execution, over-specification of
design and materials.
Others are variation instructions intended
not to be executed, deliberate over-measurement and pricing of work to
be carried out, outright fraud, approval of unascertained claims and
over-valuation/under-valuation of work executed for payment.
Adetola
stated that Nigeria has received $400 billion (N80 trillion) in aid
since 1960 (about N1.5 trillion per annum, and that almost the same
amount ($380 billion) of government money has been stolen from the
government coffers.
Meanwhile, the national president of the
Nigeria Institute of Civil Engineers (NICE) Robbie James Owivry, has
disputed the statement by saying that Adetola, being a quantity
surveyor, does not understand the situation.
“A surveyor does not
do construction, so he will not understand that mobilization fee enables
the contractor to harness the resources with which to commence a
project to the site. Mobilisation fee also portrays the
readiness/seriousness of the client to commence the project. So, how
does that fuel corruption”, Owivry said
Also agreeing with Owivry is the former Lagos State chapter chairman
of the Nigeria Society of Engineers and former Lagos State chapter
chairman of the Nigeria Institute of Building (NIoB), Tunde Jaiyesimi,
who questioned where Adetola got that idea from.
“For a quantity
surveyor to tell you that in those days, you deliver your job before
getting paid, I don’t know where he got that from. Advance payment has
always been with us. It has been abused in the past, especially by
politicians; they all have the feeling that because it is government’s
money, they can eat it. What you call advance payment is to assist the
builder to deliver on time.
“I have never seen a private
construction project where money is given out and the job not delivered.
If he says it aids corruption, he may be right because we all know how
we play politicians in this country. It is just the abuse and there are
ways of ensuring that it is not abused. You can involve the bank and
insurance companies, and get performance bond. But to say that in the
past there were no mobilization fees, I don’t think it is correct”, he
said
The national president, Nigeria Institute of Structural
Engineers, Oreoluwa Fadayiom on his part stated for anyone to say that
mobilisation fees fuels corruption is a sweeping statement which needs
to be qualified; he countered that it is more of the system.
“The
system makes it difficult for you to operate normally and drives you
towards being corrupt. The system itself wants something out of it from
you as a result, they box you in a tight corner that you have no option
than to say, ‘what else can we do’.
“If you go by the word
‘mobilisation’ it is something to get the contractor to start work. But
if you look at the system, where you start work with a respectable sum
of money. And you work for one month, and a certificate is expected to
be raised in 14 days and your payment expected to be made within another
14 days. If your certificate and payment takes three months in coming,
would you want to tie your money down.
“Because people know that
government will not pay on time, they would actually want to have their
money upfront. So instead of asking for the nominal amount that is
needed for moving you to site, you find people asking for 80% as
mobilization. This is because they know that may be the last money they
will be getting”, Fadayiom said.
He explained that thereafter,
nobody will be keen to know whether the job was executed or not because
the man that gave the contract would have collected his 40 per cent
upfront.
“If the person who gave you the job collects his bride of
40 per cent, how much are you left with to do the job, as a result you
are forced to cut corners. If you have gone to collect money from the
bank and you are not paid by the end of the day, what will you do? These
are the problems. If everybody does what he should do, there will be no
problem.
“Government takes from you but refuses to give to you,
they never honour their words. If for instance, you are supposed to pay
tax, and for certain reasons you did not pay it. After the grace
period, government will penalise you, charge you interest and insist on
collecting all of these sums before you can do any other thing. But if
it is the other way round and you ask them to pay interest, they will
just look at you and throw you paper somewhere. They never honour their
words and never does anything right, as a result, they frustrate the
entire professions in all ramification, that is the reason why you find
people asking for a huge sum for mobilization”, he said
Freddy
Ogugua Esenwa (Jnr.), head of the Department of Physical Planning and
Works of the university, however, noted that the lecture was organized
by the department as its contribution to finding solutions to the myriad
of challenges that face Nigeria as a nation.

No comments:
Post a Comment